Grand Finals' Judges score

Recently Vijay TV announced the marks of each contestant during the grand finals and that episode was little contraversial depending on the supporters ;) I dont have any say on why the scores were published given that the public vote count was also published. This was a kind of deliberate effort from the channel to prove their innocence to public and make sure they have similar backing for the soon-to-start Super singer Junior 3. I was not really surprised to see Satyaprakash getting highest marks since he performed really well on that day too and was far better than others.

How could they have Ajeesh to give marks to the contestants for the grand finals, this was the question in my mind. I really dont think Ajeesh has gone to the level to judge the final performance and I think Satyaprakash has been the best find in all seasons of Airtel Super singer. So, Ajeesh judging the performance of Satya and others were not so good. I was shocked by the marks from Ajeesh for Satya too, it was 14 marks for 2 songs and thats the lowest of all the 30 judges. I couldnt resist laughing for this while seeing many judges had given whole 20 for his performances. I think this has been biased judgement and revealing this kind of results or marks is going to affect Vijay TV.

Also, I am not sure why do they opt to have 30 judges to score the performances ? I would say they could have sticked onto 10-15 top singers and rest of them could have just enjoyed the performances or given some special performances. I wish to convey to the channel that either do things that could bring justice to the show or dont publish the way in which you organised the show. I am concerned about this because this might create biased judgement further and already public voting is been questioned by many people in the forums.